I’ve
written previously about the scrutiny placed on Muslims in the US and Europe,
the nature of the word ‘moderate’ (how it is seen as a desirable trait in
Muslims by Christians who’d probably not want the word used in reference to
their own Christianity), and the need to practice radical inclusiveness in the
face of violent extremism.
I’ve been
thinking about it a bit more (what else can one do around the holidays?) and since
my field of research and work is theology, I’d frame this around the
theological concept of ‘grace’, although the term extends into the realm of
public discourse as well.
Grace is
central to the Christian faith. Christians believe that their salvation is the
end result of the grace shown to them by God.
Out of this
grace shown to us, we then extend that grace to others. But the true tack of grace, as I see it in the biblical text, is never simply about a solipsism of personal salvation and spiritual renewal.
Grace- and all other spiritual attributes- must always have an outward-facing vision, a social component.
This is what I might call ‘radical grace’- forgiveness, compassion, works of mercy directed toward fundamental social change.
Grace- and all other spiritual attributes- must always have an outward-facing vision, a social component.
This is what I might call ‘radical grace’- forgiveness, compassion, works of mercy directed toward fundamental social change.
‘Radical
grace’ is a praxis of reflection and action toward actively building the
Kingdom of God- truth, justice, life, and light- in the world.
But for the
Christian conception of grace to become a truly ‘radical grace’, it must also
include a degree of critical reflection on the rather privileged position that
Christianity holds in the social and cultural milieu of the US.
Since
Christianity is the predominant socio-religious position in the US, it is extended
a level of grace in the sphere of social-political commentary (certainly in the
media) that is not extended to followers of Islam.
In the wake
of tragedy or terrorism, Muslim Americans immediately come under a level of scrutiny
and commentary out of all proportion to that given to Christians in the wake of
extremist Christian actions.
Simply put,
it is naturally assumed from the outset that all Christians don’t support the
views of the Westboro Baptist Church, the actions of Dylann Roof, Robert Lewis Dear, the Klan, the militias, etc.
There is no public debate about
the intrinsic nature of Christian theology, thought, or practice regarding
social views, extremism, or terrorism; pundits on the nightly news shows are
not parsing over whether or not Christianity is a ‘religion of peace’, whether
or not its stance toward women is healthy and progressive or not, or whether or
not Christians can be fundamentally trusted in the public arena.
In the civic forum, Christianity’s
intrinsic ‘goodness’ is assumed, not debated.
Moreover, Christianity’s intrinsic
diversity is assumed as well. Everyone assumes that Christianity is a broad
house with a variety of views and expressions, mostly positive or benign, some
dubious… but rarely any Christian views are immediately labelled a clear and
present danger, much less a national security threat. The religious faith of Robert Dear might be reported on in passing, but it is never held out as reason
to suspect the Christians living in your neighbourhood, what’s being preached
from their pulpits, or whether you, as a citizen, need to be concerned about
the amount of Christians living in your area.
Basically,
a Christian may, or might not choose to condemn Christian extremism if they
so desire; one might even think it would be good if they did…
but there will not be a near-continuous clamoring for them
to do so, and no calls for their monitoring, incarceration, or deportation if they don't.
The news shows will not have endless commentary from panel
shows demanding, ‘where are the voices of moderate Christianity? Why do they
not condemn these people? Why would they choose to stay silent, other than that
they silently agree?’
This is a
distinct privilege that Christians in the US and Europe have that Muslims do
not.
‘Radical
grace’ will be found, not so much in Christians condemning their extremists
more (though that would be nice…) but in cultivating a public discourse where
the majority of Muslims will need to condemn their extremists less;
Where their
public good will, civic participation, and dedication to right and justice are inherently
assumed rather than immediately doubted;
Where trust
overrides suspicion and love overcomes fear.
Jesus said, ‘From everyone who has been given much, much
will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more
will be asked.’
We have been given much grace. We have been entrusted with
much grace;
It is time to extend it with the same reckless abandon that
it has been given to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment