This week, the Pennsylvania State House of Representatives had
a moment of history, as it swore in its first female African-American Muslim
legislator, Movita Johnson-Harrell (D) of
Philadelphia.
There are enough historic milestones there for that to be newsworthy
alone. But as so often happens in America, it wasn’t a black person’s
achievement that was the primary story, but a white person’s reaction to it.
Invited to give the ceremonial opening prayer was (according
to her Facbook page) ‘very conservative’ Rep. Stephanie Borowicz (R) who
stepped to the mic and prayed thus (Note: transcribed from a You Tube clip, this
is as faithful a transcript as I could manage of the prayer, which was
improvised on the spot, so my punctuation might be sketchy):
Let’s pray: Jesus, I thank you for this
privilege, Lord, of letting me pray, God, that I, Jesus, am your ambassador
here today, standing here representing you, the King of Kings, the Lord of
Lords, the Great I Am, the one who’s coming back again, the one who came, died,
and rose again on the third day, and I’m so privileged to stand here today, so
thank you for this honour, Jesus, God, for those who came before us like George
Washington at Valley Forge, and Abraham Lincoln who sought after you at
Gettysburg, Jesus, and the Founding Fathers at Independence Hall, Jesus, that
sought after you and fasted and prayed for this nation to be founded on your
principles and your words and your truths.
God, forgive us. Jesus, we’ve lost sight of
you. We’ve forgotten you, God, in our country, and we’re asking you to forgive
us, Jesus, that your promise in your word says that ‘If my people who are
called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek your face and turn
from their wicked ways’ that you’ll heal our land. Jesus you are our only hope.
God, I pray for our leaders Speaker (Mike) Turzai, Leader Cutler, Governor
Wolf, President Trump. Lord, thank you that he stands beside Israel
unequivocally, Lord.
Thank you that, Jesus, that we’re blessed
because we stand by Israel, and we ask for the peace of Jerusalem as your word
says, God. We ask that we not be overcome by evil and that we overcome evil
with good in this land once again. I claim all these things in the powerful,
mighty name of Jesus, the one who at the name of Jesus every knee will bow and
every tongue will confess, Jesus, that you are Lord.
In Jesus’ name, Amen.
Many have criticized the prayer, calling it offensive and
divisive. By the last line, there were
loud grumblings from the assembled audience, and House Speaker Mike Turzai was
gently touching Borowicz’ elbow, gently urging her to finish up. She then
exited the chamber in protest of a Muslim being sworn in as a lawmaker.
Johnson-Harrell herself said she felt the prayer ‘blatantly represented the Islamophobia that exists among some leaders’.
Johnson-Harrell herself said she felt the prayer ‘blatantly represented the Islamophobia that exists among some leaders’.
Borowicz defended herself by saying ‘That's how I pray every
day. . . . I don't apologize ever for praying.’
That’s a bit of a dodge, as no one was criticizing her for
praying; the criticism she faced had to do with what she prayed given the place
and the occasion.
To be honest, I don’t doubt that that is the way she prays; I spent over half my life in the
Evangelical Christian subculture and can confidently tell you that this is the
way that many Evangelical Americans pray.
That said,
it’s a problematic way to pray.
This was an
almost textbook example of a 'weaponized' prayer, a prayer meant to publicly advance
a religious and political ideology, and addressed to Johnson-Harrell as much as
to God.
By using a
specifically modern Evangelical understanding of the Founding Fathers; by
making the explicit implication that America had fallen from such a pristine
Christian foundation; by framing the occasion as a moment of national failure
and needing God’s forgiveness; and by implicitly stating that American
unwavering political support for the state of Israel was a mark of national
religious righteousness, all seemed designed to send the message- and certainly
send it to Johnson-Harrell- that this was no celebration.
A Muslim
might indeed be elected to sit in that chamber, but it would never be fully
‘hers’…
This was a
Christian place, the prayer seemed designed to make clear. Christians created it, Christians owned
it.
Plus, by naming
God, the ‘Lord’, and Jesus nearly two dozen times in just under two minutes, Borowicz’ prayer almost seems to be an
incantation, invoking the name of God as some form of talisman, a protection
against the presence- and the religious faith- of a dangerous ‘other’.
Again, this
was a Christian making it plain that her beliefs, understanding, and
terminology for God were good, right, and correct.
This is
nothing less than a supremacist position- ‘Christian supremacy’. Other faiths
might be tolerated, but they will never be afforded equality. They must know
their place and not presume to seek after white American Evangelical Christianity’s
unique and privileged public position.
This is a
form of Christianity that has never figured out how to live together well with any faith other than their own and (at a stretch) Judaism. They adhere to a zero-sum approach
that sees ‘respect for’ as ‘surrender to’.
From my
years living, working, and worshiping in the Evangelical Christian subculture,
I’ve sat through hundreds of prayers like the one Borowicz gave. It was never
pleasant. Prayer was designed to declare, to chide, to correct, and to advance
agendas.
Prayers
were often said for elected officials. Prayers for Republicans were filled with
enthusiastic thanks given to God for their honour, wisdom, and courage;
Democrats got earnest prayers for their salvation and hopes they’d abandon
wickedness and turn to God.
Prayers for
Evangelical leaders and organizations were full of thanks, blessing and hopes
that they’d thrive and grow; prayers for Catholics focused on turning from dead
religion to a living, vibrant faith.
Left-leaning
Catholics like me always knew where we stood…
So I have
two interrelated questions: First, how do we ‘decommission’ our weaponized prayers?
And secondly, how do we live together well in a public space with our brothers
and sisters who hold to different faiths?
Firstly, we
can simply pray as Jesus in the biblical text told us to pray.
Jesus could
be a fairly cryptic and opaque communicator; on any number of occasions, the
Gospels describe people as being confused or offended by his teachings, if not
just plain bewildered. It is for this reason that, when he gives a straightforward
answer or, better still, a plain directive, it’s a good idea to take special
notice… and on the subject of prayer, he does so.
When his
disciples ask him to teach them to pray, he says ‘Pray then in this way’ (Matt.
6:9); ‘When you pray, say’ (Luke 11:2)…
The Lord’s
Prayer, the ‘Our Father’, was what he gave us.
Praise to
God, for his Kingdom to be established, food for today, forgiveness when we
fall short, and strength for the journey.
That’s all. So little, yet everything…
That’s all. So little, yet everything…
If Jesus
warned us, ‘do not practice your piety before others to be seen by them’ (Matt.
6:1), then the prayer he actually gave to his followers seems the perfect
preventive.
But, I hear
many argue- perhaps Borowicz herself?- how will God know what he needs to be
doing, who he needs to be blessing, and who needs stopping if we don’t tell him
so?
None of
that is our concern.
How will others know our opinions of them and our agendas for them if we don’t cloak them in holy rhetoric?
How will others know our opinions of them and our agendas for them if we don’t cloak them in holy rhetoric?
Speak for
yourself… and let God speak for himself.
Secondly, we can follow Jesus’ example in our approach to faiths other than our own.
Secondly, we can follow Jesus’ example in our approach to faiths other than our own.
Jesus lived
his life and had his ministry in one of the most multicultural spots on Earth
of that time- the eastern Mediterranean. A dizzying array of cultures,
ethnicities, philosophies and religions- pagan, monotheist, polytheist,
gnostic- jostled and interacted on a daily basis.
With that
in mind, and with the inordinate amount of effort certain Christians take in
trying to rein in, discredit, and marginalize other faiths, it’s interesting to
notice that the Gospel writers felt no need to record Jesus giving an opinion
or passing judgement on any other faith or philosophy.
We never
find out his opinions on Zeus, Aries, Mithra, Plato, or Aristotle.
In fact,
the only faith that he seems interested in critiquing is his own, arguing with
the Pharisee movement, condemning Jewish legal scholars, and taking direct
action against Temple practices.
If the
biblical authors saw no need to record Jesus criticizing and condemning other
faiths, then we can safely assume that there’s no real reason for us to do so
either.
This would
be seen as a huge sea change for many Christians.
It takes
extraordinary humility and radical faith to pray the Lord’s Prayer and nothing
else, just as it would take great courage to simply live with and interact with
good will toward non-Christian faith communities.
What I see in Borowicz prayer is fear- of what she doesn’t understand, of what she thinks is dangerous, of what she sees as a slippery slope toward her own marginalization, her own loss of status, her own loss of power…
What I see in Borowicz prayer is fear- of what she doesn’t understand, of what she thinks is dangerous, of what she sees as a slippery slope toward her own marginalization, her own loss of status, her own loss of power…
… and yet,
the biblical text is filled with dozens of instructions to ‘fear not’. Trust
God. Do what is right. Live at peace with your neighbours, regardless of their
faith or lack of it.
Pray
without ceasing…
As Jesus
taught us.
I'm appalled.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughts. I agree.
ReplyDelete